RUNTIME & AUTHORITY

Know who is acting.
Know where it runs.

The ecosystem combines a System approach, OpenAI products and independent companion software. A shared brand or architecture diagram does not make their accounts, permissions, storage or runtime the same.

THE ROLE MAP

One picture. Distinct boundaries.

PartWhere / roleScope and status
ChatGPT DotsOpenAI’s ChatGPT environment and Dot computer.Intended operational assistant for licensed Dotsys adoption; actual capabilities depend on the host.
Dotsys SystemOwner-controlled private Git repository and explicitly chosen deployments.Project structure, documents and consent approach; not a hosted AI service.
SurfaceA separately configured protected application.Project overview and bounded operator console; not supplied as a runtime by the protocol package.
OpenAI CodexAn independently authorized Codex environment.Separately approved implementation; repository and environment access must both be verified.
ZekeChatStandalone client and Chat inside Zeke’s Computer.New shared conversation experience in development; separate from the ChatGPT Dot.
Zeke’s ComputerCloud-native browser workspace with its own connected services.WebLinux implementation direction, not the Dot’s cloud computer.
Bonsai inference runnerAn explicitly paired, permitted and available local runner in the default design.Native runtime and hardware support must be checked; sleeping hardware cannot execute queued AI work.
Linux / browser jobsA supported separately configured execution backend.Not a capability created by a static website, manifest or prompt.
ClockConfigured schedule and durable occurrence/inbox facilities.A reminder and its requested AI work have different availability requirements.
Public card / helloOwner-approved HTTPS publication and human-mediated exchange.Protocol 0.1.0; no identity attestation, automatic messaging or execution authority.
THE QUESTIONS THAT MATTER

Every action should have
an understandable answer.

01

Who is acting?

A ChatGPT Dot, Codex, Zeke, a person, or a connected service. Their identities and authority are distinct.

02

What did I allow?

Identify the input, current scope and destination. Capture, build, publication, spending and access are separable.

03

What is available?

A configured interface is different from a reachable runner. State the real capability and the evidence for it.

04

What came back?

Keep the candidate, verification result and accepted revision distinct. Preserve partials and uncertainty.

COST & CONTINUITY

Cloud-native does not mean
always-on inference.

The Computer design can keep project state and scheduled reminders separate from model availability. AI work still needs a permitted, awake runner or a genuinely provided hosted route.

Local inference still has hardware, storage and electricity requirements. External APIs and hosting have their own eligibility and costs. No new paid model, provider entitlement or public exposure follows from adopting a prompt.